It’s an amount that many people pay for their current rent in San Francisco — including myself.
I often let my mind wander into fantastical places on the internet; one such regular improbable destination sits in the realm of real estate ownership in San Francisco. As a writer, editor, and, recently, publication owner, the notion of procuring a domicile of my own remains an albatross — a wayward wish that seems as intangible as immortality. Nonetheless, one can dream in the corners of my dozens of internet tabs.
Simply will never, ever (like… *ever*) get over the obscene HOA fees in San Francisco. pic.twitter.com/vW4hyjtKXP
— Matt Charnock (@M_J_Charnock) January 19, 2023
I click. I scroll. I click and scroll on Zillow and Craigslist in the wee hours of the night. Or during the day… when my mind finds said escapism far more dopaminergic than filling a Google Doc with text.
It’s an exercise that’s led me to find some really peculiar listings — i.e. a jail-cell-like apartment with a wet bath and unit inside a history-rich SF tower. Recently, I came across something so shocking, so obscene, so sobering that I simply haven’t stopped thinking about it: a $1,114 monthly HOA fee… for a $475,000 apartment at 1177 California Street.
Staggering? Absolutely. The average HOA fee sits somewhere between $200 to $300, though that median cost in California wildly eclipses that average, in many cases by over 150%.
Moreover: The typical HOA fee in California is usually less than 10% of the monthly mortgage payment, when factoring in a 20% down payment on the average CA home, which currently sits at $760,644 — a 4.4% year-over-year increase from 2021, according to Zillow.
So, for this condo? Doing some light math with the same financial parameters listed above, the nearly half-million-dollar, 411-square-foot home previously mentioned has an HOA that comes in at a staggering 40% of the $2,795 monthly mortgage payment.
For that $1,114, the Zillow-posted ad for the apartment at Gramercy Towers — a 17-story highrise owned and managed by Vanguard Properties — offers little to make that fee even remotely palpable. Said a resident of home would get access to a gym, indoor swimming pool and hot tub, a 24/hr doorman and security… and, barring a sauna, that’s it.
(On a personal anecdote, my current rent at my new 300-square-foot Nob Hill studio is $1,250 — a fiscal diamond I’m endlessly grateful to have unearthed by happenstance. When seeing HOA fees at this nauseatingly high price, I question why on earth I’d ever leave here… let alone forfeit over a grand for disposable amenities I don’t need nor want nor would ever need and want.)
Unfortunately, HOA fees sitting north of $1,000 a month aren’t uncommon in San Francisco. Units at 66 Cleary Court and 239 Brannan Street are known for shackling residents with high HOA fees — but these apartments all cost at least twice that of the one sitting inside Gramercy Towers.
The lack of affordable housing will destroy San Francisco. This is merely a fact. There’s no reason why we shouldn’t (in time, with proper rezoning implements) convert some of the 27% of San Francisco’s downtown offices that sit vacant into housing. This is reasonably attainable.
Let’s just not slap them with useless luxuries and HOA fees.
Feature image: Courtesy of SFARMLS
My HOA fees are over $1,000/month. Required for expensive maintenance in San Francisco.
24×7 doormen are expensive, and an awesome amenity. So is a pool /hot tub. And expensive maintenance Gramercy Towers is condos, and nothing to do with Vanguard Properties.
[…] paid on your mortgage from your taxable income, potentially resulting in significant tax savings. Given the high cost of real estate in San Francisco, many residents stand to benefit from this […]